The Model Driven Software Network

Raise your level of abstraction

Vlad VARNICA
  • Milton keynes
  • United Kingdom
Share 
Twitter
Facebook

Vlad VARNICA's Discussions

Is there any value in models donation ?
2 Replies

Started this discussion. Last reply by Vlad VARNICA Feb 17.

Merry Chtistmas
1 Reply

Started this discussion. Last reply by Mark Dalgarno Dec. 26, 2009.

How to make MDD more agile ?
5 Replies

Started this discussion. Last reply by Juha-Pekka Tolvanen Dec. 8, 2009.

 

Vlad VARNICA's Page

Latest Activity

I don't think there is a reliable open source business model today. The first problem is that the open spirit is not reached because projects have many users but very free contributors. The second is that because no contributors the professional qua…
March 1
Hi Peter, I agree with you that software is now free. It is almost impossible to make any revenue from selling modeling software because open source or free alternative. I also feel that with the "cloud" companies are not considering that developin…
March 1
Graphical UML models should be built directly on the top of the metamodel and not be a model itself and then use model transformation to get an xmi. This is a not needed stage with Omondo. If you use UML editors on the top of a single metamodel and…
February 27
I will have a look. Thanks for the tip :-)
February 26
It seems to me there is a confusion in the UML modeling stages: First you need to select UML or EMF modeling. EMF is not UML modeling and will never be. If you select EMF then you can use OpenArchitectware or Accelero. If you select UML then you c…
February 19
Thanks for you reply Geert, I know that Eclipse UML2 metamodel is complex and require an important personal investment. To become a metamodel architect you need about 18 months full time codding which is painful. I think that if you are integrator,…
February 17
Vlad, I agree with you, there is a distinct value in sharing models. As a modelling consultant, me and my colleagues Koen and Christophe have worked at a range of different customers. Although most of these customers worked in different domains we…
February 17
Thank for the link which is dealing with State diagram. It could be interesting to add templates and directly generate code from other diagrams and not just class diagram. If you write your code by hand or generate it by MDD it is the same problem b…
February 3

Profile Information

My interest in Model Driven Software Development:
Simplify UML modeling complexity and improve productivity. Use modeling with continuous integration process & agile projects.
My experience of Model Driven Software Development:
Product manager at Omondo and inventor of the UML live synchronization with MOF concept.
My website
http://www.ejb3.org/
My blog (or equivalent)
http://www.forum-omondo.com/index.php

Comment Wall (7 comments)

You need to be a member of The Model Driven Software Network to add comments!

Join The Model Driven Software Network

At 3:28pm on January 25, 2010, Bob Fields said…
Sure, I'd love to comment on AndroMDA occasionally. There's been quite a lot of work going on over the last few months, after being stagnant for about two years, with several new committers (including myself) coming onboard.

Personally, I'm just a corporate developer/architect, not a consultant. Our main focus here is simply getting things done quickly and moving onto the next project, we don't get paid by the hour and don't have lots of time to create elegant architectures and project-specific design pattern implementations, that's why we chose andromda about two years ago as our MDA tool. I saw lots of opportunity for improvement (i.e. UML2 2.x support, JAX-WS support), implemented those internally, and then contributed them back to the project. We also liked maven, though it took some time to work through some of the quirks and bugs but it's pretty stable now.
At 9:00am on June 3, 2009, William El kaim said…
the problem is not the market but what media said about open source. It's free, no need to train people, no need to invest in any way. We are back to the sad days of Visio ... And even Visio ...
The way people do Agile also kills architecture in a certain way.

Architecture is not an appreciated job, modeler also. That's a great opportunity for some companies, to kill others. And i'm not confident on the future of companies like mine or the one you cite. Somebody as to pay the technical debt ...
At 8:40am on June 3, 2009, William El kaim said…
It's not my house, but what my company is currently buidling and the way people are thinking. The financial crisis was a good opportunity to destroy everything I built the last two years. No more architecture pattern, no more documentation, 100% budget cut and all architects back to coding (we fired all suppliers). The technical debt is growing enormously, but nobody cares except me. And i'm not the only one. At least with MDD, I will be sure that some foundations will be enforced.
At 12:30pm on February 13, 2009, Johan den Haan said…
As I said, no problem.
At 8:36am on January 22, 2009, Sean Kavanagh said…
The example in your comment didn't seem to demonstrate interchange of models and diagrams between tools. Obviously, if you use the same tool then interchange is possible. However, many people see a major benefit of UML being that there are multiple tool vendors ensuring that they don't get locked in. However, at present, most UML users do get locked in to the tools they use. For me, the main issue is whether I can get off-the-shelf modelled packages which solve significant portions of my current problem and that can be integrated into my application without a significant performance hit. I don't believe that will ever happen with UML since the standard didn't start with that as an objective and there are now too many vested interests to fix UML (or XMI). Look at my website for details of how I am trying to make it happen with Shlaer-Mellor OOA/RD (and Executable UML as a profile of Shaer-Mellor!).
At 9:16pm on January 21, 2009, Sean Kavanagh said…
The MDA market is dying because UML/XMI is a crap standard that hasn't facilitated reuse across the industry. People are so busy trying to reuse the many standards that make up the MDA umbrella that they have lost sight of the fact that they should be trying to reuse software at a higher level than plain old function libraries. A goal which can't be achieved using those standards anyway!
At 6:51pm on January 18, 2009, Rui Curado said…
You sound like a quite disappointed professional...
 
 

Badge

Loading…
 

© 2010   Created by Mark Dalgarno on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service